VivaMalta - The Free Speech Forum - Canada

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
August 24, 2017, 10:53:02 AM

Home Help Search Login Register
+  VivaMalta - The Free Speech Forum
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  World Issues
| | |-+  Canada
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 9 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Canada  (Read 6226 times)
malsey
Senior Member
Senior Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2630

« on: June 05, 2006, 06:17:06 PM »

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/5047160.stm
 
Vandals strike at Toronto mosque

Muslims make up about 2% of Canada's population

Vandals smashed windows at a Toronto mosque hours after Canada announced it had foiled an alleged Islamist bomb plot, arresting 17 men and youths.
At least 28 windows were broken but nobody appears to have been hurt in the overnight attack and a mosque official said five cars were also damaged.
Police have not officially linked the attack on the mosque with the arrests.
But a spokesman assured Muslim community leaders that hate crimes would not be tolerated.
"It is certainly possible that that damage was motivated by hate," Toronto Police Chief Bill Blair said.
"Hatred in any form, and certainly in its expressions of violence and damaged property, will not be tolerated in our community."
Ameer Ali, secretary of the International Muslims Organization of Toronto which houses the mosque, said it was one of the largest in North America and has about 500 worshippers daily.
Senior Muslim community leaders also told The Associated Press they had been receiving threatening e-mails since the arrests were announced.
'Serious threat'
Twelve men were charged on Saturday with planning a bombing campaign in and around Toronto.
Canada's intelligence agency said it had been inspired by al-Qaeda.
Five youths were also charged, following an investigation involving more than 400 officers.
Police seized bomb-making materials in a series of raids in Toronto, including three tons of ammonium nitrate. Officials said the group, most of whose members appear to be Canadian residents from Muslim backgrounds, "posed a real and serious threat".
Report to moderator   Logged
IMPERIUM
Norman Lowell
Global Moderator
Senior Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14914


« Reply #1 on: February 06, 2009, 11:13:09 AM »

I sionisti si odiano da soli           di Massimo Mazzucco - 05/02/2009

              Fonte:                 luogocomune.net [scheda fonte]                            


Chavez non ha dubbi: ?Sono stati loro, e io lo dico davanti al paese?, ha dichiarato parlando dell?attacco alla sinagoga di Caracas, avvenuto nella notte del 30 gennaio.

Ufficialmente, la sinagoga ? stata attaccata da 15 ?chavistas? - ovvero uomini mandati da Chavez ? che hanno distrutto alcuni oggetti sacri, strappato la Torah e imbrattato i muri con scritte e simboli antisemitici, prima di scomparire nella notte.

Il mattino seguente il capo della ADL, Abrahm Foxman, sapeva gi? tutto: "La comunit? internazionale -
ha dichiarato - ha appena finito di commemorare l?olocausto, e una sinagoga di Caracas ? stata teatro di una moderna Notte dei Cristalli. Per cinque ore violenti antisemiti hanno profanato e vandalizzato gli oggetti e lo spazio pi? sacri della tradizione ebraica, lasciando scritte sui muri che dicevano ?Andatevene!?, ?Morte a tutti? e ?Maledetto Israele, morte?. Questo violento attacco ricorda i giorni pi? scuri che hanno portato alla Shoah?? eccetera eccetera.

A sua volta la ADL, nel pubblicare il comunicato di Foxman, ha scritto: ?La Anti-Defamation League (ADL) condanna il violento attacco ad una sinagoga di Caracas e chiede al presidente Hugo Chavez di denunciare prontamente questo disgustoso gesto di odio antiebraico, e di portare al pi? presto i colpevoli di fronte alla giustizia?.

Forse l?ultima parte della frase potevano risparmiarsela, perch? Chavez ha subito mandato alla sinagoga i suoi investigatori, i quali hanno scoperto delle cose molto curiose.

Bisogna infatti sapere che quella sinagoga ? una specie di fortezza impenetrabile, circondata da alti muri sormontati da fili elettrici, ?

? e si trova in una zona molto frequentata della citt?. Quella sera inoltre era in corso, nel vicino stadio, un importante incontro di calcio. Nonostante la quantit? di gente che ? transitata nella zona in quelle ore, gli investigatori non sono riusciti a trovare un solo testimone che abbia visto ?15 chavisti? arrampicarsi sui muri della sinagoga.

Pi? che devastati, inoltre, gli oggetti sacri apparivano appoggiati al suolo in ordine sparso, e le foto non mostrano certo i segni di una furia belluina. Dopo 5 ore in cui "violenti antisemiti hanno profanato e vandalizzato" tutto, ti aspetti come minimo di trovare un rabbino abbrustolito, e l'altro incinto con un candelabro che gli esce dalla bocca. Invece le scritte sui muri, pi? che denunciare un violento odio antisemitico, denunciano un violento stato di demenza da parte dei deturpatori, che hanno lasciato degli scarabocchi degni di un bambino di 7 anni.

Ma poi, vanno in quindici-dico-quindici, per rompere due candelabri e fare quattro scritte sui muri? In quindici hanno assaltato l'Hotel di Bombay, e lo hanno tenuto in ostaggio per tre giorni. Inoltre, perch? mai fare le scritte sui muri dentro, e non sui muri fuori? Preferisci fare un dispetto al rabbino, che dopo deve pulirle, piuttosto che far conoscere il tuo messaggio a tutta la citt??

Ma la pi? bella deve ancora arrivare. Bisogna infatti sapere che la sinagoga ? dotata di dozzine di telecamere di sicurezza, collocate in ogni angolo, stanza o corridoio, ma quando gli investigatori hanno chiesto le videocassette ai rabbini, si sono sentiti dire che ?le avevano rubate tutte gli chavisti?.

Come ? noto infatti le videocassette della security non vengono tenute in locali speciali, chiusi a chiave, e difficilmente accessibili agli estranei, ma spuntano direttamente da sotto ciascuna telecamera, ad altezza d?uomo, in modo che il ladro scappando possa ritirarle senza stare a perdere tempo.

Fra l'altro, questo significa che i "violenti antisemiti" si sarebbero dimenticati di portare il classico passamontagna, per cui hanno passato mezz'ora a rovesciare candelabri, e le altre 4 ore e mezza a cercare le maledette cassette che li avevano ripresi mentre lo facevano a volto scoperto.

- Cazzo, ma tu da che parte eri girato, mentre rompevi quel bicchiere?
- Non lo so, non mi ricordo.
- Meglio premunirsi, cerchiamole tutte.
- Tutte? Ma ci vorranno delle ore!
- Non preoccuparti, c'? tempo. Il comunicato dell'ADL non esce prima delle nove del mattino.

Alla fine gli astuti chavisti si sono portati via tutte le cassette di sicurezza, ma si sono dimenticati di uccidere i rabbini, che li avevano visti in faccia per 5 ore consecutive.

A quel punto Chavez, che ha studiato l'undici settembre e sa bene cosa significhi la "mancanza" delle videocassette, ? andato dritto in TV e ha sparato a zero: ?Sono stati loro, lo dico davanti al paese, e cercher? di dimostrarlo con ogni mezzo a mia disposizione, perch? ? l?oligarchia quella violenta, quella che minaccia di incendiare il paese, mentre noi siamo i portatori di pace?.

Dimenticavamo di dire che poco tempo fa il ministro degli esteri venezuelano aveva dichiarato di voler portare Israele davanti ad un tribunale internazionale per i massacri di Gaza. Mentre in Venezuela a giorni ci saranno le elezioni, e il partito di Chavez ? nuovamente in forte vantaggio sull?opposizione.

Trattasi di congiunzioni cosmiche fortemente sfavorevoli, che possono portare certe persone o gruppi di persone direttamente all?autocombustione.



               
               Tante altre notizie su www.ariannaeditrice.it              

The usual self inflicted anti-semitic hate crime.
World Press screaming "15 racists broke into synagogue and smashed 'everything' "-
Such hate!

Chavez immediately denounced the Jews as being the perpetrators.
Nothing broken! Objects placed on the floor all over the place!
The miserliness of the Jews!

Nobody believes them any more.
We know them so well, after their 4,000 years of trickery and deceit.
They have had their innings...

Imperium
0902



Report to moderator   Logged
Boycott The Times and The Sunday Times.
Do not post there, do not buy a copy of either, do not advertise.
Hurt Them in the only way they understand.

BOYCOTT THE TIMES
 Imperium 1107

wiking
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 211

« Reply #2 on: February 06, 2009, 12:53:57 PM »

Quote from: IMPERIUM
The usual self inflicted anti-semitic hate crime.
World Press screaming "15 racists broke into synagogue and smashed 'everything' "-
Such hate!

Chavez immediately denounced the Jews as being the perpetrators.
Nothing broken! Objects placed on the floor all over the place!
The miserliness of the Jews!

Nobody believes them any more.
We know them so well, after their 4,000 years of trickery and deceit.
They have had their innings...

Imperium
0902




 
Do you really think that nobody believes them anymore. I am not so sure.
Hope I'm wrong but I don't think I am.
 
Regardless of what Chavez says, if his views are not aired on the widely viewed media, then its pretty useless, country leader or not.
 
The fact that such an article appears on a website does not make it widely available. I think that only people interested in racial preservation, nationalism and such view these sites anyway, and they are too few worldwide. I hope I am wrong on this too.
 
So even if I am wrong on both counts, people still don't vote right.
Let's see how the candidates outside of the MLPN are going to fare in the upcoming MEP election.
Report to moderator   Logged
IMPERIUM
Norman Lowell
Global Moderator
Senior Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14914


« Reply #3 on: August 28, 2011, 09:41:13 AM »

Why our immigration levels can?t climb too high
The Vancouver Sun ? Martin Collacott
http://www.vancouversun.com/news/immigration+levels+climb+high/5264051/story.html


Former federal Liberal cabinet minister Robert Kaplan recently
proposed that Canada increase its population to 100 million through
increased immigration in order that we become more influential on
the world stage. While some may find this visionary in its scope,
it totally fails to take into account the realities of today?s Canada.
Many of our larger cities are already groaning under the weight of
high immigration intake that is increasing congestion, house prices
and costs to taxpayers. A recent paper by Herbert Grubel and
Patrick Grady estimated that newcomers cost Canadians between
$16 and $23 billion a year because of what they receive in government
benefits over what they pay in taxes. Added to this is concern over
the increasing concentrations of immigrants who come from cultures
and traditions that are very different from those of most Canadians.
...
That there is a gap between what our leaders think we want and
what average Canadians want is not surprising. ... Among opinion
makers in the United States (politicians, leaders of church groups,
business executives, union leaders, academics, etc.) only 18 percent
thought immigration should be reduced, compared to 55 per cent of
the public.


Canada, a White country when Maltese emigrated there in the 50s.
Today, Canada a multiracial mess - Toronto/Downsview a 3rd World spot.
Canada, ruined because of non Europid Immigration.

2012: Anno Zero!

Imperium
1108

« Last Edit: August 28, 2011, 10:16:58 AM by IMPERIUM » Report to moderator   Logged
Boycott The Times and The Sunday Times.
Do not post there, do not buy a copy of either, do not advertise.
Hurt Them in the only way they understand.

BOYCOTT THE TIMES
 Imperium 1107

IMPERIUM
Norman Lowell
Global Moderator
Senior Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14914


« Reply #4 on: August 31, 2011, 10:03:08 AM »

August 27 -- Anniversary of Zundel "False News" Victory in Supreme Court of Canada

On August 27 1992, Canada's Supreme Court struck down as unconstitutional the law under which Ernst Z?ndel was convicted for publishing a Revisionist booklet about the Holocaust. In a four-three decision, the judges ruled that the "false news" law under which he was convicted violates the freedom-of-speech provisions of Canada's Charter of Rights, and is thus unconstitutional.  Thereby, the highest court of Canada threw out, as unconstitutional, Section 181 of the Criminal Code of Canada - the ancient "False News law" under which Ernst Z?ndel had been tried and convicted in 1985 and 1988. By doing so, the Supreme Court of Canda substantially strengthened the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.  [source]
The Supreme Court of Canada held that:Section 2(b) of the Charter protects the right of a minority to express its view, however unpopular it may be. All communications which convey or attempt to convey meaning are protected by s. 2(b), unless the physical form by which the communication is made (for example, a violent act) excludes protection. The content of the communication is irrelevant. The purpose of the guarantee is to permit free expression to the end of promoting truth, political or social participation, and self-fulfillment. That purpose extends to the protection of minority beliefs which the majority regards as wrong or false.
Section 181, (the "False News Law") which may subject a person to criminal conviction and potential imprisonment because of words he published, has undeniably the effect of restricting freedom of expression and, therefore, imposes a limit on s. 2(b).Writing for the majority, Justice Beverley McLachlin stated:"To permit the imprisonment of people, or even the threat of imprisonment, on the ground that they have made a statement which 12 of their co-citizens deem to be false and mischievous to some undefined public interest, is to stifle a whole range of speech, some of which has long been regarded as legitimate and even beneficial to our society."[See full SCC decision: R. v. Zundel, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 731]
  In spite of the hostility and hatred which the media had shown to Z?ndel over the years, they grudgingly admitted in editorial after editorial across Canada that the decision was the right one and that the "false news" law had threatened the right to freedom of speech of all Canadians. La Presse in Montreal applauded the decision, the Montreal Gazette said "good riddance" to the law. The heading of the editorial in the Globe & Mail was "The right ruling on false news". (Globe & Mail, August 28, 1992) The Toronto Sun, an extremely anti-Z?ndel newspaper whose editor refuses to use Z?ndel's name in columns and editorials, nevertheless agreed with the verdict in an editorial headlined "Free to speak" and stated that "the cause of freedom of expression is too important to be sacrificed on any altar of anger" at Z?ndel. (Toronto Sun, Aug. 28, 1992) The Toronto Star editorialized that "this mature verdict upholds free expression..." (Toronto Star, August 28, 1992) The Calgary Herald editorial agreed that "to protect freedom of speech for all citizens, society must tolerate even the most obnoxious opinions of a minority." (Calgary Herald, Aug. 28, 1992)  -- Marc Lemire
 
  For more information on the 1992 Supreme Court victory for freedom of speech see: Zundelsite - Canada Supreme Court ExcerptZundelsite - Zundel Chronology - Part 7 of 13
Supreme Court of Canada - Decisions - R. v. Zundel.
 
 
Another blow to the Rodents, who were behind the "Hate Laws" in Canada, as elsewhere.
Where historians, writers were imprisoned for denying the biggest Lie since the Virgin Mary.
We of IE do not deny the HolyHoax - how can we deny anything that never happened?
 
2012: Anno Zero!

Imperium
1108
Report to moderator   Logged
Boycott The Times and The Sunday Times.
Do not post there, do not buy a copy of either, do not advertise.
Hurt Them in the only way they understand.

BOYCOTT THE TIMES
 Imperium 1107

IMPERIUM
Norman Lowell
Global Moderator
Senior Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14914


« Reply #5 on: October 20, 2011, 09:41:59 AM »

The article below appeared in the September 2011 issue of the SAFS Newsletter, published by the Society for Academic Freedom and Scholarship (www.safs.ca). The author, Professor Kenneth Hilborn, is also the author of IN THE CAUSE OF THE WEST and several other booklets in the C-FAR Canadian Issues Series.
EDUCATION OR INDOCTRINATION?



Kenneth H.W. Hilborn

The new Dean of Education at the University of Western Ontario believes that "teacher education programs have the potential to nurture and develop a commitment to social justice in their students and ensure these students acquire the knowledge and skills they need to promote equality." So we were informed by Western News, the university administration's official newspaper, in its issue of March 3, 2011.
Western News quotes the Dean as saying: "Educational scholarship and research strongly situated within an ethic of social justice can exert important societal influences and point us in the direction of those strategies and actions that will result in equality for all children. Universities, and in particular teacher education programs, are critical to the success of this transformation."
Conspicuously absent from this politically correct rhetoric is any indication of respect either for intellectual diversity or for the academic freedom of instructors and students in an education faculty. Also troubling is the fact that nobody can be sure precisely what the rhetoric means. Is "social justice" a code term for some sort of socialism, or at least for an expansion of the existing welfare state? Is it a code term for racial preferences -- perhaps even quotas, or "targets" that can be met only through something amounting to quotas?
As for "equality for all children," does that mean promotion from grade to grade regardless of academic performance? How can "equality" be reconciled with maintenance of academic standards, except on the unrealistic assumption that all individuals are equally intelligent and equally motivated? Should all members of a class receive the same mark, determined by the average of individuals' marks? That would be absurd, but if "equality" for all is the goal, the advantages naturally enjoyed by the most intelligent and most highly motivated must somehow be taken from them and redistributed to others -- a project impossible to attempt without subordinating individuals to the group.
One point does seem obvious -- the fact the new Dean is not interested primarily in making sure that future teachers have the "knowledge and skills they need" to teach mathematics, science, French or whatever, or even to explain clearly the principles of English grammar and sentence structure. She appears more interested in disseminating among teachers the dogma of egalitarianism, and in preparing them to indoctrinate their pupils with the values of "equality" and "social justice" (though evidently not individual liberty). Such a priority potentially opens the door to ideological screening of those who apply for admission to an education school, and possibly even to pressure for ideological conformity as a condition of graduation.
Schemes to impose a political "litmus test" on future teachers have already been attempted in the United States, but fortunately they have encountered effective resistance. In its publication "FIRE Media Impact, 2009," the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (www.thefire.org) reproduced four articles about a proposal at the University of Minnesota that read like a bizarre attempt by campus leftists to satirize themselves. It would have required all faculty members who were training teachers to "comprehend and commit to the centrality of race, class, culture, and gender issues in teaching and learning, and consequently frame their teaching and course foci accordingly." (So much for academic freedom, as well as what many might regard as the irrelevance of race, class, culture and gender to mathematics, physics, chemistry, etc.) As for those being trained to teach, they were to be screened before admission to weed out applicants with unacceptable beliefs, though remedial indoctrination was to be permitted in borderline cases. It was expected that successful candidates for the teaching profession would be "able to discuss their own histories and current thinking drawing on notions of white privilege, hegemonic masculinity, heteronormativity, and internalized oppression." Teachers were also to work for "social justice," display an understanding of American history that embraced the "myth of meritocracy," and recognize classrooms as "critical sites for social and cultural transformation."
FIRE intervened to warn the university -- a public institution -- that requiring students to pass any ideological test would be unconstitutional, meaning that students who got into trouble for clinging to "incorrect" views could find protection in federal court. FIRE also publicized the situation. Eventually the university's general counsel promised FIRE that the institution would never "mandate any particular beliefs, or screen out people with 'wrong beliefs' . . ."
All public universities in the United States have to reckon with the risk of being sued if they violate a student's right to free expression under the Constitution's First Amendment -- an amendment that originally restricted only the federal power, but which later constitutional change led the Supreme Court to apply to states and their agencies (including universities) as well. Though many public universities still have repressive "speech codes," they can be enforced only against students ignorant of their rights or unwilling to take legal action. To impose ideological screening and indoctrination on any would-be teacher would be to invite a lawsuit. Whether or not for that reason -- to quote the Chronicle of Higher Education (December 2, 2009) -- "the governing board of the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education voted in 2007 to stop suggesting that teacher-preparation programs take their students' views on 'social justice' into account."
Lacking the high level of legal protection enjoyed by Americans under judicial interpretations of the First Amendment, Canadians have to rely more on the other major technique that FIRE has found useful in U.S. cases -- publicity aimed at shaming or embarrassing university administrators into some degree of at least outward respect for individuals' rights to political and intellectual liberty. We must hope that if would-be teachers -- at Western or elsewhere -- find themselves subjected to ideological discrimination or coercive indoctrination, they will have the strength of character to resist by all the lawful means at their disposal, and that they will receive effective support from SAFS, civil-liberties organizations, the media and public opinion.

(Kenneth H.W. Hilborn, a professor emeritus of history at the University of Western Ontario, is a former member of the University Senate and of the SAFS Board of Directors.)
 
 
The Lie of Equality fostered by the Rodents - their biggest lie after the HolyHoax.
And now We know where id-Duluri ta-Kristu gets her Equality Mad ideas for our schools.
It's those crypto communist advisors around her.
 
2012: Anno Zero!

Imperium
1110
Report to moderator   Logged
Boycott The Times and The Sunday Times.
Do not post there, do not buy a copy of either, do not advertise.
Hurt Them in the only way they understand.

BOYCOTT THE TIMES
 Imperium 1107

IMPERIUM
Norman Lowell
Global Moderator
Senior Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14914


« Reply #6 on: October 23, 2011, 10:51:47 PM »

PRESS RELEASE by THE GERMANY-UNITED STATES-CANADA RECONCILIATION COMMITTEEKevin@Talonbooks.com or James Bacque at 705 549 8148 or Merrit P. Drucker at 202 722 6716. Please contact Talonbooks for interviews
                                                                                                                       
See also www.jamesbacque.com and www.talonbooks.com and the Verband deutscher Soldaten www.verband-deutscher-soldaten.de
 
A real holocaust.
The starving of hundreds of thousand of German PoWs.
At last, the healing of old wounds.
 
2012: Anno Zero!

Imperium
1110
 
Report to moderator   Logged
Boycott The Times and The Sunday Times.
Do not post there, do not buy a copy of either, do not advertise.
Hurt Them in the only way they understand.

BOYCOTT THE TIMES
 Imperium 1107

Sepp44
Senior Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3330

« Reply #7 on: October 28, 2011, 09:25:14 AM »

Hungarian Gypsies flocking to Canada


                           Published: Oct. 27, 2011 at 2:45 PM
           
                                                                        
                                                                                                                                                                           Related Stories
                TORONTO, Oct. 27 (UPI) -- Canadian immigration authorities say an  unprecedented number of gypsies from Hungary are seeking refugee status  on arrival in Toronto.
 Canada Border Services Agency workers were overwhelmed one night last  week when a record 110 gypsies arrived on one flight and extra staff  had to be called in to process them, the Toronto Sun reported.
 The agency said as many as 50 gypsies from Hungary show up and apply for refugee status each day.
 In recent years, the stateless ethnic group has denounced the term gypsy as derogatory and adopted the name Roma.
 Gina Csanyi-Roban, executive director of the Roma Community Center,  told the Sun city shelters are full and efforts were under way to find  housing for the newcomers. She said the problem wasn't with the city,  but with the federal authorities.
 "The Canadian government has been silent on the issue," she said.
 All of the refugee status-seekers have alleged they have been targeted in Europe by neo-Nazis, or skinheads, the report said.
 Unidentified border officials told the Sun many of the elderly  gypsies have health problems that will likely place an increasing burden  on the country's free medicare system.


Read more: http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2011/10/27/Hungarian-Gypsies-flocking-to-Canada/UPI-23241319741127/#ixzz1c3gmvMqe
Report to moderator   Logged
IMPERIUM
Norman Lowell
Global Moderator
Senior Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14914


« Reply #8 on: November 22, 2011, 09:58:08 AM »

LEVANT: No More Witchhunts

For 34 years, Canada has had a disgraceful censorship law that violates our human rights.
the crime of publishing or broadcasting anything that can cause hurt feelings.
Back in 1977, that law was focused on telephone lines and answering machines. But 10 years ago, it was expanded to include the Internet.
So it even covers things like whatever you post to your Facebook page. Section 13 says
So if you publish anything on Facebook, or on your cellphone voice message,
He said I violated his human right not to be offended.
No more witch hunts by the Canadian Human Rights Commission. No more persecuting their political and religious enemies.
This is the best thing the Harper government has done in five years. Freedom is on the march. (Toronto Sun, November 19, 2011)
 
 
At last! Canada is about to free itself from that hateful "Race Law" legislation.
Treudeau had passed this law under pressure from the Rodents - always behind every mischief.
So many Canadians, historians, teachers and others, were hauled to court, imprisoned for holding/expressing an opinion.
 
For the Rodents wanted to create a situation where only themselves could speak, spew hatred against everyone and everybody.
Nobody could express an opinion, remotely touching them - that would be antisemitism.
But they are losing their grip, as the whole world opens its eyes to their diabolical machinations.
 
In Malta, I have endured years of harassment by a Christian Hyopcritical Establishment.
Years of silence from a Squallid Socialist opposition, that forgot its own past of suffering under such laws.
Years of Court appearances, Media lies, moral lynching by a Country that does not know of Individual Rights.

10 months after our Constitutional Court, the Supreme Law of the land, threw out a scandalous verdict - a verdict condemning me to years of imprisonment:
the Appeal Court Judge and date of hearing has not yet been appointed.
The corrupt Establishment: Malta is truly bankrupt.
 
But We shall persevere, endure as we always have.
And We shall emerge victorious - Us, having fought alone.
And We will Win alone, for We need nobody - The Strong are Strongest when Alone.
 
We have our unshakeable believe, our Ideological underpinning.
That is what keeps us unerringly on our path to Nature's Truth.
And We shall prevail.
 
2012: Anno Zero!
Imperium
1111
Report to moderator   Logged
Boycott The Times and The Sunday Times.
Do not post there, do not buy a copy of either, do not advertise.
Hurt Them in the only way they understand.

BOYCOTT THE TIMES
 Imperium 1107

IMPERIUM
Norman Lowell
Global Moderator
Senior Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14914


« Reply #9 on: December 18, 2011, 10:07:26 AM »

Marc Lemire on the Ezra Levant Show & Important Questions About Jewish Lobby Support for Censorship

Here is the full video of Marc Lemire's interview on Ezra Levant's show Thursday, plus a follow up interview with Chris Shaeffer of the Canadian Constitutional Foundation.

Marc Lemire, the target of Canada's speech mandarins for 8 years, joins Ezra Levant to discuss, amongst other things, the activities of federal employee Richard Warman.

This is an intelligent discussion of the whole Sec. 13 Internet censorship issue. The publicity is great for freedom. Marc does a solid job.
Very interestingly, Ezra, who is, of course Jewish himself, highlights the fact that several of the interveners for censorship were Jewish lobby groups.. When Marc mentions B'nai Brith, Levant says: "That stunning to me. That's embarrassing to me."

When Marc mentions former Canadian Jewish Congress head Ed Morgan, a legal heavy hitter, acting as the voice of the obscure African Canadian Legal Clinic, Levant says: "I find it frustrating that official Jews are on the side of censorship."

This is not the first time Levant has expressed his strong disagreement with Jewish lobby demands for and support for censorship. Levant himself, back to his college days at the University of Alberta, has stood against censorship. Whether the various Jewish lobby groups are misrepresenting the average Jew in their obsession to control thought is hard to know.

However, as every politician knows as he/she tiptoes are the issue of free speech and censorship, the Jewish lobby has had a controlling hand in promoting this repression in Canada. As far back as the 1930s, the Canadian Jewish Congress was lobbying for restrictions on speech. In 1971, they finally got their "hate law", thanks to Pierre Elliott Trudeau, who was a great fan of the Napoleonic Law where the accused is deemed guilty until proven innocent and where the individual does not have innate, God-given rights, but only those rights stingily dole out to him by the State.

At numerous Sec. 319 "hate law" cases and in many Sec.l 13 (Canadian Human Rights Act Internet censorship) tribunals, including the Lemire case, the Canadian Jewish Congress, the League Human Rights of B'nai Brith and the Friends of the Simon Wiesenthal Centre have been there to vociferously defend their gift of censorship to the Canadian people.

Paul Fromm
Director
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION


The Rodents.
Behind the unconstutional Hate Laws enacted in every country in the West.
An affront to our Aryan Traditions of Freedom of Opinion, Expression and Diffusion of Ideas.

The Rodents.
Out to destroy the White Race by gagging those who defend it.
Throwing Freedom of Inquiry into prisons.

The Rodents.
The Eternal Mischief Makers, insatiable, implacable in their hatefulness towards us: Europids.
"The Enemy of Mankind" - Voltaire

2012: Anno Zero!
Imperium
1112
Report to moderator   Logged
Boycott The Times and The Sunday Times.
Do not post there, do not buy a copy of either, do not advertise.
Hurt Them in the only way they understand.

BOYCOTT THE TIMES
 Imperium 1107

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 9 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
 
SMF 2.0.12 | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
TinyPortal © 2005-2012

VivaMalta - The Free Speech Forum, Canada - Theme by Mustang Forums