VivaMalta - The Free Speech Forum - Canada

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
December 16, 2017, 08:23:07 AM

Home Help Search Login Register
+  VivaMalta - The Free Speech Forum
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  World Issues
| | |-+  Canada
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 9 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Canada  (Read 6703 times)
IMPERIUM
Norman Lowell
Global Moderator
Senior Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15358


« Reply #20 on: July 17, 2012, 06:00:53 PM »

http://www.winnipegsun.com/2012/07/17/two-dead-19-injured-in-toronto-shootingAs I stated at Safi, years ago: Toronto has become a Jamaica.
Toronto is now an unsafe city to live in.
The African primates have ruined it.
 
And Maltese Canadians, liberal bastards, write on the Times urging us to accept Africans.
Maltese Canadians berate Maltese Patriots for being "racists".
Well, Ja Zibel, we don't want to end up like you.
 
Canada, like America, has been ruined by the Jews.
For it was these Rodents, who opened the doors to massive, non-European immigration.
Them!  Il-Grieden tad-Drennagg!
 
2012: Anno Zero!
Imperium
201207
 
http://www.google.com.mt/search?q=toronto+outdoor+party+shooting&hl=en&gbv=2&prmd=ivnsu&source=univ&tbm=nws&tbo=u&sa=X&ei=XooFUMXsBcr34QTD7p3rCA&ved=0CBgQqAI
 
 
« Last Edit: July 17, 2012, 06:03:02 PM by IMPERIUM » Report to moderator   Logged
Boycott The Times and The Sunday Times.
Do not post there, do not buy a copy of either, do not advertise.
Hurt Them in the only way they understand.

BOYCOTT THE TIMES
 Imperium 1107

IMPERIUM
Norman Lowell
Global Moderator
Senior Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15358


« Reply #21 on: July 22, 2012, 10:59:56 AM »

Re Post 28
 
This is Toronto, turned in just 30 years into a Jamaica.
Black primitives have ruined this once peaceful, orderly city.
Now, a jungle of crime.
 
 
Metropolitan Toronto Police Service: The Colour of Crime -- Is there a pattern here?   Thursday, July 19, 2012
Send this story to someone | Printer-friendly page
Robbery (Swarming) - 42 Division

9498/87953/00:11

Robbery (Mugging) - 53 Division

9671/87953/00:29

Robbery (Purse Snatch) - 42 Division

8695/87947/02:03

Robbery (Mugging) - 31 Division

8970/87947/02:16

Robbery (Business) - 22 Division

5928/82158/07:53

Robbery (Mugging) - 41 Division

9993/87953/20:03

Break & Enter (Dwelling) - 55 Division
A resident of Danforth Avenue reports that on July 19, 2012 between 0700 hours and 1200 hours entry was gained into the premises through a sliding door. Removed was a quantity of cash, jewellery, sports equipment and computer equipment.
8914/87953/20:31

Break & Enter (Dwelling) - 33 Division
A resident of Tudor Gate reports that on July 19, 2012 between 0904 hours and 1000 hours entry was gained into the premises by forcing a door. Removed was a quantity of jewellery and a laptop.
 10829/87953/20:57 http://www.torontopolice.on.ca/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=6228&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0   By the way, Blacks constitute under 7 per cent of the population of Metropolitan Toronto.   2012: Anno Zero! Imperium 201207
Report to moderator   Logged
Boycott The Times and The Sunday Times.
Do not post there, do not buy a copy of either, do not advertise.
Hurt Them in the only way they understand.

BOYCOTT THE TIMES
 Imperium 1107

IMPERIUM
Norman Lowell
Global Moderator
Senior Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15358


« Reply #22 on: July 24, 2012, 08:20:59 AM »

The attack seemed 'almost personal' in its brutality, police said, but noted there is currently no indication it was anything other than a robbery. The youth remains in very serious condition at Sunnybrook Hospital, police said. Gajan Pooniah, 19, of Markham is charged with attempted murder and robbery." (Toronto Star, July 18, 2012)
 
[This article appears in the July, 2012 issue of the CANADIAN IMMIGRATION HOTLINE. Published monthly, the CANADIAN IMMIGRATION HOTLINE is available by subscription for $30 per year. You can subscribe by sending a cheque or VISA number and expiry date to CANADIAN IMMIGRATION HOTLINE, P.O. Box 332, Rexdale, ON., M9W 5L3.]

------------------------

The Joys of Multiracial Canada, a once All White orderly Country.
The Jews ruined Canada, as they did the USA, England and most other White Countries:
when they opened the floodgates to non Europid immigration.

 
They are able to do this through their Cultural dominance.
Their Media, TV, magazines, TV hosts of the type: Peppi tal Pipa, il Prim Purcinell Popolari tal Pajjis...
And their fellow tribesmen, everywhere undermining, sowing discord and confusion.


They do this in their long term plan to destroy the White Race.
Induce chaos everywhere, within which they can operate undisturbed.
For, who would think of chasing Rodents in a ship caught in a storm?

Il Grieden tad-Drennagg!


2012: Anno Zero!
Imperium
201207
« Last Edit: July 24, 2012, 11:01:13 AM by IMPERIUM » Report to moderator   Logged
Boycott The Times and The Sunday Times.
Do not post there, do not buy a copy of either, do not advertise.
Hurt Them in the only way they understand.

BOYCOTT THE TIMES
 Imperium 1107

IMPERIUM
Norman Lowell
Global Moderator
Senior Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15358


« Reply #23 on: January 29, 2013, 08:26:20 AM »

A German WW II Survivor Blasts the Toronto Star & Sets the Record Straight
 
To the Toronto StarA war that was unavoidable and predictable after the Versailles treaty was forced unto Germany by the Allies, which gave German territory to Poland. The German population was being slaughtered and driven out by the Poles. For this reason Hitler went into Poland to save his people. Due to this humane action of trying to save his people, Britain and France declared war on Germany, although it was Polish Cavalry that attacked Germany's border  towns first.

Hitler made several attempts to establish peace with the Allies starting in May 17, 1933 to October 6, 1939 which were ignored .

It amazes me to no end that individual people, the media and especially Hollywood are still harvesting endless profits 70 years later on the  distortion of the actual facts. Why does not anyone write a satirical story on Churchill, conducting meetings in the nude only wearing his silk underwear ? Perhaps the  historians should have a look at the real facts why it all started and who started it, not the Hollywood version, and have the courage to publish it. Some have had the courage. However, they are banned in the so-called democratic  country of Germany, The truth fears no questions, only the lies do !

Sincerely yours,

A Survivor,

Rosemarie Rohrbach-Gabriel

--------------------

Canada is the most Judaized country in the world - the Rodents control it, completely.
And they are doing everything to multiracialize it with non Europids.
The Jew will always, everywhere undermine the Country and People who host him.


00101
The Golden Dawn
Imperium

Report to moderator   Logged
Boycott The Times and The Sunday Times.
Do not post there, do not buy a copy of either, do not advertise.
Hurt Them in the only way they understand.

BOYCOTT THE TIMES
 Imperium 1107

IMPERIUM
Norman Lowell
Global Moderator
Senior Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15358


« Reply #24 on: February 14, 2013, 10:22:13 AM »

HP - I could write a book about how the Israel Lobby sabotaged our relations with Arab countries, and how they destroyed the naive patriot Macdonald (then Chief of Export Development Policy) when he protested! - Paul Fromm

February 10, 2013
 
Editor
NATIONAL POST
Toronto                                                                             
 
Dear Sir,
 
Conrad Black shows his Zionist colours
 
I have followed the career of Conrad Black almost from its inception; initially with admiration, later with disillusion and consternation, finally with sympathy as his choice of partners came to light, leading inevitably to his arrest and incarceration, while those who lured him into wrongdoing, and profited handsomely thereby, betrayed him and emerged scot free.
 
Lord Black obviously faced, and still faces, a conflict of loyalties, from seeking acclaim from the Jews by marrying (literally and figuratively) into the Zionist movement, and from a guileless pursuit of status and honours within the Gentile Establishment.  How else would one explain his irrational purchase of the prestigious, but failed, "Jerusalem Post" at 25 times the asking price, and his association with unsavoury, but high-profile, figures such as Richard Pearl and Henry Kissinger?  And how else to explain the pathetic plea in his Column of February 9 for sympathy for the universally-despised, war-mongering State of Israel?  Or his whitewashing of the cruel dispossession of the Palestinians and illegal occupation of their land.
 
He attempts to justify Israeli aggression by referring to the "murder of half the world's Jewish population", ignoring both the fact that 4.6 million Jewish survivors officially applied for compensation after the War (long-since putting the lie to such "extermination" stories), and Prof. Raul Hilberg's no-less-damning admission, confirmed by leading "Holocaust" scholars, that not a shred of forensic evidence exists of the notorious mega-gassings.
 
His most incriminating and deceitful claim, however, is that the Harper Government support of Israel has not reduced Canada's influence in the Arab world, since Canada had "no influence" there to lose! I spent 2 years in the Middle East as Commercial Counselor based at the Canadian Embassy in Beirut and called on top-level officials and businessmen in all Arab countries.  Without exception, they looked on Canada with affection as an honest player in international affairs with no imperialist baggage and told me that Canada was their trading partner of choice.
They showed their sincerity by offering contracts, joint ventures and concessions that would have earned Canadian companies tens of billions of dollars -, had they not been sabotaged by successive Canadian governments beholden to the Israel Lobby.  (When I attempted to expose the costly subversion, I was summarily dismissed, the stringent safeguards of the Public Service Employment Act notwithstanding).

 
In the case of Libya, where the Ghadaffi Government, shortly after taking office, offered Canada many valuable concessions (including rights to 300,000 bpd production from BP's former share of the Sarir field, which BP agreed not to challenge), the Canadian Government vetoed further contacts by their own successful negotiator, guaranteeing, as in the case of the Middle East, that our competitors would win.  Not satisfied with this act of treason, the Israel Lobby prevailed on the Government to take part in a vicious military attack on our defenceless would-be benefactor, a gratuitous provocation and betrayal that will not soon be forgotten by our erstwhile Arab friends.
 
As ever,
 
 
Ian V. Macdonald
Canadian Foreign Service rtd.
ex RCAF, RNFAA


------------------------

The incredible meddling, sabotaging of Canada's interests by these pestilent Rodents.
These implacable Rodents who have turned Canadian cities, like Toronto in African jungles.
Canada is the most Judaized, Zionized country in the world.


00102
The Golden Dawn
Imperium
« Last Edit: February 14, 2013, 02:32:07 PM by IMPERIUM » Report to moderator   Logged
Boycott The Times and The Sunday Times.
Do not post there, do not buy a copy of either, do not advertise.
Hurt Them in the only way they understand.

BOYCOTT THE TIMES
 Imperium 1107

IMPERIUM
Norman Lowell
Global Moderator
Senior Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15358


« Reply #25 on: April 14, 2013, 07:54:17 PM »



The Occidental Observer
 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Fromm on the Demise of Free Speech in Canada


Posted: 13 Apr 2013 12:17 PM PDT
Paul Fromm, a pro-White activist who writes for his CAFE (Canadian Association for Free Expression) website, has an article on a recent ruling by the Canadian Supreme Court that once again indicates the power of the cultural left at the highest reaches of Western societies ”The Whatcott Decision – A Grim Day for Christians and Freedom of Speech“). The case involves a $15000 fine (plus court costs likely to be north of $150,000) imposed on an evangelical Christian who distributed leaflets containing criticism of homosexuality based on Biblical teachings. Some excerpts and comments:

The decision is pure cultural Marxism. It reflects the triumph of *Frankfurt School* social science which has captured most Western universities. While economic communism collapsed and was defeated, cultural communism was spread by the *Frankfurt School*. Basically, it sees the world divided up into two classes: oppressors – those would be White Christians, and especially sexually healthy White males – and the oppressed – those would be women, homosexuals, Jews, and certain other racial minorities. To overthrow the “oppressors” and to establish universal equality – not of opportunity but results – the *Frankfurt School* targeted loyalty to family, country and religion. There began a concerted campaign of “deconstruction” whereby political heroes, cultural heroes – the dismissal of traditional English literature as the writing of dead, White males – and traditional Christianity were mocked and attacked. These ideas have captured the upper echelons of Canada’s judiciary and bode poorly for freedom of speech.

The Whatcott decision holds that in human rights cases:
· Truth is no defence;
· Intent is no defence;
· No harm needs to be proven to have been caused to a “vulnerable” minority;
· A minority is designated as “vulnerable” not because of any evidence – the court admits concrete evidence is often lacking, but on the mere say-so of a human rights commission or court;
· Christians are not protected from hatred as they are not a “vulnerable minority.”

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Court depicts Mr. Whatcott as having the power to intimidate homosexuals. The reality is far different:
Well, where’s the evidence that in the decade since Mr. Whatcott handed out his flyers critical of homosexuals, that “dialogue” wasshut down and homosexuals were unable to respond? For nearly 20 years, the powerful homosexual lobby has been pushing for same sex marriage – a revolutionary anti-family retreat from tradition.

In 2001, Parliament overwhelmingly voted to endorse the traditional definition of marriage – one man and one woman. The lobby continued its pressure, apparently not intimidated or silenced by the lonely Mr. Whatcott’s leafleting. A cowardly Jean Chretien referred the “question” as to whether the traditional definition of marriage, accepted by almost all but the fringiest elements of Christianity, and by Judaism, Islam, and Hinduism, was “discriminatory” to the judicial revolutionaries on the Supreme Court. They collapsed and gave the homosexual lobby what it wanted. Canada has same sex marriage.

Despite being a Catholic, Liberal Premier Dalton McGuinty of Ontario forced even Catholic schools to promote the homosexual agenda in the schools and have Gay-Straight Alliance Clubs, even though the practice of homosexuality violates Catholic teaching. (So much for religious freedom!) The homosexual agenda has triumphed in almost every battle. It successfully pressured to have “sexual orientation” added to the privileged groups protected by Sec. 319 of the Criminal Code, Canada’s notorious “hate law.”

In fact, there’s no evidence  that Mr. Whatcott’s pathetic little leafleting operation ever intimidated any homosexual from promoting his cause. The only one excluded from the debate is Mr. Whatcott! Mr. Whatcott and strong critics of the homosexual agenda are all but excluded from the mainstream media. Pro-homosexual commentators bray their views from the CBC and the Globe and Mail is virtually a mouthpiece for the homosexual lobby. The only voices marginalized are critics of the homosexual agenda.

Fromm targets the Frankfurt School, a Jewish intellectual movement discussed in Chapter 5 of The Culture of Critique:

Despite calling themselves a “School of Social research,” the Frankfurt School feared any objective research that might challenge their ideology. Like the Supreme Court, they defined the world ideologically, and facts would not be allowed to get in the way:

The Frankfurt School never set out to find out the truth about human behavior and institutions. Instead, its members viewed empirically oriented social science as an aspect of domination and oppression. Horkheimer wrote in1937 that “if science as a whole follows the lead of empiricism and the intellect renounces its insistent and confident probing of the tangled brush of observations in order to unearth more about the world than even our well-meaning daily press, it will be participating passively in the maintenance of universal injustice.” Rather than find out how society works, the social scientist must be a critic of culture and adopt an attitude of resistance toward contemporary societies.

The unscientific nature of the enterprise can also be seen in its handling of dissent within the ranks of the Institute—a trend that is a common feature of Jewish intellectual and political movements Erich Fromm was excised from the movement in the 1930s because his leftist humanism opposed the authoritarian nature of the psychoanalyst-patient relationship. This was not compatible with the pro-Bolshevik stance championed at the time by the Horkheimer-Adorno line: Fromm “takes the easy way out with the concept of authority,without which, after all, neither Lenin’s avant-garde nor dictatorship can be conceived of. I would strongly advise him to read Lenin…I must tell you that I see a real threat in this article to the line which the journal takes. (See Chapter 5 of The Culture of Critique.)

One of the most shocking revolutionary conclusions of the Court is that truth should not be a defence, at least in human rights cases: “The lack of defences is not fatal to the constitutionality of the provision. Truthful statements can be presented in a manner that would meet the definition of hate speech, and not all truthful statements must be free from restriction. …

Fromm emphasizes the Jewish role in this decision:


Finally, and this is a delicate topic in oppressive, minority-ruled Canada, let’s look at the makeup of the six judge panel who heard this crucial case about the rights of Christians. Three, yes three, or fully one half of the panel were Jews. Under the regime of employment equity, a Canadian version of anti-White “affirmative action”, invented by, guess who? Madame Justice Rosalie Silberman Abella, who was on the panel, “systemic discrimination” is evidenced by an over-representation or under-representation of a group.

It must be remembered that Jews, at about 310,000, constitute less than one per cent of Canada’s population, but made up half of panel in Whatcott! Did their personal views interfere? Ironically, had Justice Abella applied her own “employment equity” she’d have removed herself from the panel in Whatcott as her minority was already heftily over-represented.

The author of this freedom trashing opinion was Mr. Justice Marshall Rothstein of Manitoba. His biography on the Supreme Court website notes: “He served as an adjudicator under the Manitoba Human Rights Act from 1978 to 1983 and as a member of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal from 1986 to 1992.” In other words, he was, for more than a decade, part of the whole repressive “human rights” industry he was now being invited to critique. In his case, there was more than a “reasonable apprehension of bias.” Perhaps, no surprise he found state censorship and strong criticism of privileged minorities perfectly justified in a “free” [do words mean nothing!] and “democratic society.”

At least two Liberal senators, Robina Jaffer and Jim Munson (a former journalist happily at ease with state censorship), in speaking against Bill C-304, which would repeal Sec. 13 (Internet censorship) of the Canadian Human Rights Act quoted Justice Abella and her emphasis on“vulnerable minorities”: to wit: “In a 2009 speech entitled Human Rights and History’s Judgment, Justice Rosalie Abella said: We were supposed to have learned three indelible lessons from the concentration camps of Europe.

First, indifference is injustice’s incubator. Second, it’s not just what you stand for, it’s is what you stand up for. And third, we must never forget how the world looks to those who are vulnerable.’” Justice Abella was also part of the human rights industry having served on the Ontario Human Rights Commission. Her biography on the Supreme Court website notes: “She married Canadian historian Irving M. Abella on December 8, 1968.” Irving Abella is a past president of the Canadian Jewish Congress, a pro-censorship intervener in Whatcott. The CJC has been a long-time and strident supporter of anti-free speech “hate laws”. Again, one might wonder why Justice Abella did not recuse herself from this case is there is more than a “reasonable apprehension of bias.”

It is certainly true that the organized Jewish community has been a strong  voice supporting laws curtailing free speech, not just in Canada, but throughout the Western world (see “The Hate Crimes Prevention Bill: Why Do Jewish Organizations Support It?“). Irving Abella’s book was cited in my chapter on the Jewish role in promoting immigration. Although the chapter emphasizes the Jewish role in altering U.S. immigration policy in favor of non-Whites, the Jewish community played a similar role throughout the West, including Canada:

In the case of Canada, Abella (A Coat of Many Colors: Two Centuries of Jewish Life in Canada; 1990, 234–235) notes the important contribution of Jews in bringing about a multicultural Canada and, in particular, in lobbying for more liberal immigration policies. Reflecting this attitude, Arthur Roebuck, attorney general of Ontario, was greeted “with thunderous applause” at a 1935 convention for the Zionist Organization of Canada when he stated that he looked “forward to the time when our economic conditions will be less severe than they are today and when we may open wide the gates, throw down the restrictions and make of Canada a Mecca for all the oppressed peoples of the world” (in M. Brown 1987, 256).
 
 Abella also co-authored a book, None Is Too Many that was critical of Canada for not admitting Jewish refugees in the World War II era. The title comes from a statement of a senior Canadian immigration official that summed up Canadian policy.

Thus we have Jewish activists involved in academic research on Jewish issues. And perhaps more importantly, Jewish activists are involved in court decisions that reflect consensus views within the Jewish community on issues related to free speech, multiculturalism, and immigration. The hostile elite in action.

---------------------------


Canada is the most Judaized, Zionized country in the world.
Totally enslaved by the Rodents, Whites enslaved and muzzled.
The Jews: who have opened the floodgates and turned Toronto and major cities into African hell holes.


IL GRIEDEN TAD-DRENAGG!

00104
The Golden Dawn
Imperium
Report to moderator   Logged
Boycott The Times and The Sunday Times.
Do not post there, do not buy a copy of either, do not advertise.
Hurt Them in the only way they understand.

BOYCOTT THE TIMES
 Imperium 1107

IMPERIUM
Norman Lowell
Global Moderator
Senior Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15358


« Reply #26 on: July 16, 2013, 07:14:26 PM »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svbX5EcX_pg

Canada: the most Zionized, tyrannical country in the Western World -
where scientists, lawyers, teachers have been imprisoned for years under the hateful Hate Laws -
has now repealed the wicked Section 13 -

where the vaguest implication that a writing could instill "Racial Hatred":
would send one up to six years in prison!
Doug Christie, a top lawyer, a martyr for Freedom of Thought, died a few days before this repeal.

And lawyer Paul Fromm (the equivalent of our Dr. Emmy Bezzina), has been fighting Canadian tyranny for years.
He will be visiting us, here in Malta, later on this year - He follows our Battle for Freedom, closely.
With our friends all over the White World, We Will Win!


00107
The Golden Dawn
Imperium
« Last Edit: July 17, 2013, 10:09:07 AM by IMPERIUM » Report to moderator   Logged
Boycott The Times and The Sunday Times.
Do not post there, do not buy a copy of either, do not advertise.
Hurt Them in the only way they understand.

BOYCOTT THE TIMES
 Imperium 1107

IMPERIUM
Norman Lowell
Global Moderator
Senior Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15358


« Reply #27 on: July 22, 2013, 10:00:12 AM »

Unemployment & Immigration
 
Last week, Prime Minister Stephen Harper shuffled his cabinet. He kept many of the same old faces while bringing in some new blood. Getting a lateral move was long-time Minister of Citizenship and immigration, Jason Kenney, a whirlwind of activity, indeed the Energizer Bunny of cabinet. He becomes Minister of Employment and Social Development. The economy will likely be the key issue in the next federal election and job creation will be an important measure of the government's success. Yes, Canada's scandalous unemployment rate has come down since the dark days of the 2008-2009 mega-recession.
 
Still there is much to be done.
 
"Almost 175,000 Canadians are watching the economic recovery from the sidelines. While Canada's labour market has rebounded sharply from the depths of the recession, the number of long-term unemployed has refused to budge, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has found, The percentage of Canadians who have been without work at least a year (the definition of long-term unemployment) highlights a blight that remains in the post-crisis era. ... Those hardest hit in the slump were young people and workers with low skills, who are suffering unemployment levels of 13.8 per cent. That compares with the 6.3-per cent jobless level among those with medium skills (those who graduated form high school but went no further,)" the Globe and Mail (July 17, 2013) reported.
 
And, then, quoting Avery Shenfield, chief economist at CIBC World Markets Inc., the Globe continued: "There's going to be more significant bouts of long-term unemployment. But also generally the softness of the economy has made it more difficult for those leaving school to find their first job."
 
So, what did our new-fledged Minister of Employment do in his previous incarnation over at immigration? He brought in hordes of immigrants -- at least 265,000 a year as well as more than 400,000 on temporary workers' permits. This flood simply added to the misery of the unemployed, to say nothing of the waste of their potential and the cost to the Canadian economy.
 
Writing in the Globe and Mail (July 18, 2013), Jim Stanford, an economist with the United Autoworkers, pointed out, as we have on previous occasions that the official unemployment figures are misleadingly and articificially low.
 
"This week’s cabinet shuffle was probably the first in history unveiled on Twitter. And cabinet’s most pugnacious tweeter, Jason Kenney (the new Minister of Employment and Social Development), wasted no time going online to map out his coming approach. Within minutes of his appointment, he tweeted, 'I will work hard to end the paradox of too many people without jobs in an economy that has too many jobs without people.'

That message spoke volumes about Mr. Kenney’s view of the Canadian labour market. The government will continue to play down job creation as an economic priority. Instead, the minister fully accepts the 'mismatch' theory: Namely, that the key challenge is matching up unemployed Canadians with employers anxious to use their services. Help employers find the right workers, in the right place, at the right price, and presto – problem solved.

This approach implies that the unavailability of skilled and willing workers is significantly constraining Canada’s recovery. It’s been invoked to support many Conservative policy thrusts, from the controversial Temporary Foreign Worker programme to repeated cuts in Employment Insurance eligibility.

But the theory is wrong, both theoretically and empirically. Except in very rare circumstances, the labour market almost never runs out of workers. The usual problem is a general, persistent inadequacy of employer demand for labour. That’s as clear as ever today. Measured appropriately as a share of the working-age population, employment in Canada has recouped less than one-quarter of the ground it lost during the 2008-09 recession, and progress has been stalled since January, 2011.

Officially, unemployment is 1.4 million, and that’s just the tip of the iceberg. Declining labour force participation (as workers give up looking) represents 325,000 more workers. Other forms of hidden unemployment (including involuntary part-time and other precarious positions) takes the tally well above two million – pushing the true unemployment rate above 12 per cent. The clear constraint is the number of jobs, not the availability of willing workers.

Skills aren’t the problem, either. More Canadian workers have postsecondary training than any other country. Millions of Canadians don’t remotely use their existing skills to their full potential. While investments in more training always make sense, there is no general skills shortage. ....

The number of jobs unfilled because of a genuine lack of qualified applicants is surely fewer than 100,000.

Even officially, then, there are more than six unemployed Canadians for each job vacancy. Practically, the ratio is more like 20 to one. Job creation should occupy 95 per cent of Mr. Kenney’s attention. Instead, he will likely focus on more social engineering: adjusting the expectations, attitudes and flexibility of the unemployed, rather than trying to stimulate job creation."

Continued high levels of immigration and the temporary workers programme cruelly help maintain a large pool of unemployed Canadians. That may be good for employers looking to do things on the cheap, but it's bad for young people, recent graduates and all sorts of Canadians who are unemployed. Unemployment costs the economy and the taxpayer to say nothing of the damage it inflicts on the lives and families of the unemployed.

We need a five-year moratorium on immigration so that the market may soak up the unemployed and get Canadians back to work. High immigration levels skew the job market; the temporary workers permits allow employers to avoid recruiting and training Canadians.

It's time to put Canada and Canadians First -- Impose a Five Year Moratorium on Immigration, Cancel the Temporary Workers' Programme and Put Canadians Back to Work.
 

Paul Fromm

Director

CANADA FIRST IMMIGRATION REFORM COMMITTEE

----------------------------

Dr Paul Fromm, a leading Advocate in Canada who has fought for years to repeal the wicked Section 13 -
will be visiting us, here in Malta, later on this year.
We wish him well in the battle for Freedom for Canadians.


00107
The Golden Dawn
Imperium

Report to moderator   Logged
Boycott The Times and The Sunday Times.
Do not post there, do not buy a copy of either, do not advertise.
Hurt Them in the only way they understand.

BOYCOTT THE TIMES
 Imperium 1107

IMPERIUM
Norman Lowell
Global Moderator
Senior Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15358


« Reply #28 on: July 24, 2013, 08:10:03 AM »

Arthur Topham Explains His Response to Warman's Libel Threat
 
 
Dear Free Speech Supporter:
 
Let's never confuse Canada's cankered legal system with fairness or justice. It may be the "law" but it isn't necessarily fairness or justice.
 
Free speech hero and anti-Zionist advocate Arthur Topham, is currently fighting a very serious Sec. 319 ("hate law") charge, instigated by Richard( the chronic complaint filer Warman) and Harry ("Mr. B'nai Brith B.C.")  Abrams. Not surprisingly, the complaint was swiftly adopted by the political police out in BC, the RCMP hate squad headed by Det. Const. Terry Wilson, ex of the London Police Service hate Squad.
 
These charges could send Mr. Topham to prison for two years. His silencing has for some years been the goal of Canada's thought police. In 2007, Harry Abrams who had previously tried to use the B.C. Human Rights Commission to silence war hero and columnist Doug Collins, filed a complaint against Arthur Topham and his Zionist-critical website radical[press.com. under Se. 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act (truth is no defence, intent is no defence).  When Marc Lemire won his case --  against yet  another  Warman complaint -- on September 2, 2009, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal adjourned the several outstanding complaints, including the one against Arthur Topham and Radicalpress.com, sine die.
 
So, Abrams and Warman, in an effort to silence Mr. Topham, then launched the present Sec. 319 "hate law" charges.
 
Back in 2005, speaking to the violence-prone Anti-Racist Action (ARA) and then in a boastful and expansive mood, Mr. Warman explained the tactic he called "maximum disruption." He indicated that, depending on the circumstances and his mood, he'd file Sec. 13 (now repealed by Parliament) human rights complaints and or Criminal Code Sec. 319 complaints against his ideological targets.
 
He didn't add, but he might have, that should the victims criticize him, they might find themselves subject to a libel suit. In fact. Mark and Connie Fournier of the pro-Zionist but pro-free speech FreeDominion.com website, who face no fewer than three Warman libel suits, indicate that, by their reckoning, Warman has filed or threatened to file no fewer than 60 (yes, sixty!) defamation actions against critics over the past 13 years.
 
So, in the effort to silence Arthur Topham and Radicalpress.com, the Sec. 13 having been stymied, Mr. Warman and Abrams filed the Sec. 319 "hate law" charges. When the gutsy Arthur Topham refused to be silenced and continued to post his contentious critiques of Richard Warman on his website the latest libel threat was issued. Maximum disruption!
 
I've been there. From 2003 to final resolution, when the Supreme Court of Canada refused to hear our appeal in 2009. CAFE and I fought a Richard Warman libel suit aimed at CAFE's efforts to defend the victims of Warman's Sec. 13 complaints,. Ultimately, I can't explain it or believe it, but Madame Justice Monique Metivier decided that our calling Richard Warman a "censor" was libellous. So, here's one state-protected person around whom we must tip-toe carefully.
 
I know it's not the free Anglo-Saxon system of open discussion we thought we'd inherited, but it's the perverse legal reality of the present in a Canada with a judicial system, at least at the very top, firmly in the control of the cultural Marxists. We llive in enemy occupied territory where many truths can be told, if at all, only with great circumspection.
 
Purists may say that Arthur should fight and stand by the truths of his postings. The problem is that justice in this poxy country, as even several of the members of the current Supreme Court have noted, is beyond the means of the ordinary man. Arthur Topham has elected to withdraw from the libel fight and accept the imposition of extreme caution in mentioning the name of Canada's legal establishment's fair haired boy, Richard Warman and, despite his destitution, compensate the posh Ottawa civil servant $500 for his legal fees. Those who might criticize Mr. Topham should answer the simple question: "Along with your keyboard commando critique, have you sent him a cheque for $50,000 to carry on the fight?" A libel case would almost certainly be held for the complainant's convenience close to home in Ottawa. How is the impoverished Arthur Topham,who can barely afford the gas money to go to Quesnel, to fund a libel case that could last weeks in far-off Ottawa? Mr. Topham seems to think the action would be fought in Toronto. Warman's previous modus operandi suggests the venue would actually be his present home town of Ottawa.
 
The Ontario courts in Ottawa are hostile territory. A lawyer told me some years ago "the courts here don't like you guys" -- meaning free speech supporters. That would be the hostile environment in which Westerner and free thinker -- both outsider groups in Ottawa  -- Arthur Topham would have to fight. Justice in Canada today is for the rich or the government-funded, not for rock scrabble freethinking pensioners like Arthur Topham.
 
Warman's threat of libel action, of course, comes strategically just as Arthur Topham's "hate law" case begins. It is difficult, with limited resources, to fight on two fronts. Warman, who has, one assumes a full time job somewhere in the Department of National Defence, seems to somehow find endless time for a legion of lawsuits and complaints. Outside the weird Ottawa world, a libel suit consumes one's life. I know, having been there with a previous Warman defamation action that gobbled up six years (!) of my time and effort, interestingly at the very time I was being hounded by the Ontario Teachers' Federation in a prolonged and equally costly action to take away my teaching certificate for expressing on by own time, off school property, my political beliefs.
 
Bottom line: Arthur Topham continues to need and shall receive our support for his battle against the forces of thought control seeking to send him to jail for his views through the current Sec. 319 "hate law" charges he presently faces.
 
 
Paul Fromm
Director
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION

 
----------------------------

Richard Warman is a pest, an incorrigible, hateful Rodent.
He does what comes naturally to him - what is in his Satanic genes.
He has ruined scores of honest, upright, patriotic persons.

But he has had his innings, as those of his Tribe.
And the day of reckoning is approaching.
And he will have nowhere to go.

IL-GRIEDEN TAD-DRENAGG!


00107
The Golden Dawn
Imperium
Report to moderator   Logged
Boycott The Times and The Sunday Times.
Do not post there, do not buy a copy of either, do not advertise.
Hurt Them in the only way they understand.

BOYCOTT THE TIMES
 Imperium 1107

IMPERIUM
Norman Lowell
Global Moderator
Senior Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15358


« Reply #29 on: November 02, 2013, 08:14:59 AM »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQtsdRlF_MI&feature=youtu.be


Dr Paul Fromm - an indefatigable fighter for Freedom of Expression.
Canada's equivalent to our Dr Emmy Bezzina.
Two heroes both our People owe so much.


00111
The Golden Dawn
Imperium
Report to moderator   Logged
Boycott The Times and The Sunday Times.
Do not post there, do not buy a copy of either, do not advertise.
Hurt Them in the only way they understand.

BOYCOTT THE TIMES
 Imperium 1107

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 9 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
 
SMF 2.0.12 | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
TinyPortal © 2005-2012

VivaMalta - The Free Speech Forum, Canada - Theme by Mustang Forums