VivaMalta - The Free Speech Forum - Recent Posts

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 23, 2017, 08:37:18 AM

Home Help Search Login Register
+  VivaMalta - The Free Speech Forum
|-+  Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
World Issues / Re: Italy
« Last post by IMPERIUM on November 22, 2017, 09:02:00 PM »

Wednesday, November 22, 2017, 14:54 by Reuters

EU-Libya deal on migration may be breaching Geneva Convention - Kofi Annan
Italy's Left party and former UN chief criticise current migration policies

A deal with Libya that has slashed the number of migrants reaching Italy could scupper the ruling centre-left Democratic Party's (PD) already dwindling hopes of staying in power next year as it is opposed by the PD's potential coalition partners.

The deal, struck in February, is popular with the Italian public and with right-wing and anti-establishment parties now ahead in opinion polls, but it has drawn criticism from the United Nations, rights groups and many on Italy's left.

Under the accord, Italy and the European Union pledged to finance migrant camps in Libya, and Rome also agreed to train the Libyan coastguard, part of a crackdown on migrants attempting the hazardous sea crossing to Europe.
But the deal has also led to tens of thousands of migrants being trapped in Libya, where humanitarian groups say they are locked up in appalling conditions, bought and sold, and subjected to crimes on a daily basis.

One politician who wants changes to the agreement is Emma Bonino, a former foreign minister in a centre-left government.
"I've always criticised this agreement with Libya. It's a cork in a bottle that cannot hold," Bonino told Reuters.
"Italians have the perception that they are being invaded by Muslim foreigners. It's not true. Fear is fantastic for winning elections, but it's simply useless for controlling migration."
Italians have the perception that they are being invaded by Muslim foreigners. It's not true. Fear is fantastic for winning elections, but it's simply useless for controlling migration
Bonino is considering forming a pro-EU party with other left-leaning figures that could support the PD ahead of next year's national election, which must be held by May.
In other criticism of the Libya deal, Giulio Marcon, the top lawmaker in the lower house for the Italian Left party, said: "We cannot be complicit in migrant push backs".

Left-wing voters hold humanitarian values dear, said Marcon, whose party has so far refused an alliance with the PD.

 The PD needs the support of other parties, on the left in particular. It trailed the populist 5-Star Movement in a recent poll with 24 percent to 29 percent, while a centre-right coalition that includes the anti-immigrant Northern League, Silvio Berlusconi's Forza Italia (Go Italy!) and the far-right Brothers of Italy has combined support totalling about 36 percent.

The deal with Libya, modelled on a similar one struck between the EU and Turkey, has been successful in reducing the flow of migrants into Italy, with arrivals down by about a third so far this year compared to the same period in 2016. In October alone arrivals were down about 80 percent from a year earlier.
Ordinary Italians, alarmed by the arrival of some 600,000 migrants in the past four years, have welcomed the trend. An SWG poll this month showed two thirds of Italians do not want more immigrants, fearing they will take away jobs and increase crime.

The Northern League, tapping into the anti-immigrant mood, has seen its popularity more than double to about 15 percent in three years. Its leader, Matteo Salvini, has accused "fake refugees" of "invading" Italy and bringing crime with them.
Not to be outdone, the 5-Star Movement's candidate for prime minister, Luigi Di Maio, this summer accused charity ships rescuing migrants piled onto overcrowded and unseaworthy boats of being a "taxi service".
Under the February deal, Libya's coastguard has so far picked up about 20,000 migrants, including refugees. They are then forced into detention centres where they can be held indefinitely.
We cannot be complicit in migrant push backs

Last week the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights condemned the EU's support for the Libyan coastguard as "inhuman" because intercepted migrants were imprisoned and subjected to "unimaginable horrors".

Former UN secretary-general and Nobel Peace Prize winner Kofi Annan said the Libya deal suggested Italy was complicit in a breach of the Geneva Convention, which says refugees cannot be returned to a place where they may be persecuted.
"Under the Convention, you cannot push them (refugees) back. But if you make an arrangement with somebody else to keep them from moving, in a way you are complicit," Annan said during a trip to Rome this month.


The insanity of the Left.
Infected by the Jesus Poison - for Communism and Socialism are simply the Political Expression of Christianity.
An anti-Nature, anti-Survival and anti-Life religion of Death.

The Golden Dawn
Music and Dance / Re: Currently playing
« Last post by IMPERIUM on November 22, 2017, 08:18:29 PM »

Tai Chi Music Sounds


The Golden Dawn

Malta / Re: MALTA 20,000 years ago
« Last post by IMPERIUM on November 22, 2017, 11:31:47 AM »

Wednesday, November 22, 2017, 00:01 by Bernard Vassallo, Swieqi
Neolithic past

Our islands feature almost 30 temples, above and below ground, of the late Stone Age, exhibiting huge or large stones or megaliths. We do not only have Ħaġar Qim, Mnajdra (picture) and the Tarxien Temples.
Many have been lost with the passing of time. And others risk being lost through recent and modern ‘development’. A case in point is It-Tumbata, just outside Luqa, where under or adjoining the modern reservoir a few ancient finds remain to be seen today. This was a site of major importance when it was first discovered.
David Trump expressed his view that no other territory in North Africa or in Europe, even, significantly, in neighbouring Sicily, exhibits  such a large amount of prehistoric megalithic remains. These were mainly very ancient sanctuaries or temples, which functioned in the past as religious and civic hubs to an evolved people in our distant past.
Sicily’s lack of late Neolithic temples is curious. This places Malta and Gozo in a unique context. And our two main islands could indeed qualify uniquely as ‘sacred islands’.
In schools in Greece, pupils study a specific subject known as ApXaia, pronounced Arhéa, meaning ancient history, of which their country offers countless sites and features, which the people are so proud of.
I understand that in Malta and Gozo’s schools this subject of ancient history is until now partly included in our pupils’ history curriculum. But is this enough? Given our wealth of prehistoric remains, maybe this subject could become more specific and focused and become even a separate subject. This would enhance awareness of our unique past among our rising generations.
A most readable and concise recent publication with text by Anthony Bonanno and excellent photography and design by Daniel Cilia, is now on our bookshelves. It is an important aid to clarifying and expanding on our knowledge of our Neolithic past. It is entitled The archaeology of Malta and Gozo – 5000 BC-AD 1091.
I feel it is worth using it as a learning tool in our schools and at the University.
Sufficient awareness of our Neolithic past can, in my opinion, be further enhanced.


See previous posts.

The Golden Dawn

Ask Lowell / Re: Why was JFK killed
« Last post by IMPERIUM on November 22, 2017, 11:22:59 AM »

Wednesday, November 22, 2017, 00:01
by Rodolfo Ragonesi
The JFK assassination - Rodolfo Ragonesi

Finally, after 54 years in the waiting, the world has more top secret files on one of the blackest days of democracy, the murder of a sitting president of the US, one whose tenure held so much hope for many.
President John Kennedy was no ordinary leader. He had vision, intelligence, courage and a willingness to shake up the establishment, even to the core. He was up against J. Edgar Hoover of the FBI, who had denied persistently that organised crime even existed in the US.
He was up against the Mafia, against the CIA that dragged the Whitehouse into the Bay of Pigs fiasco, against the banks that were amassing staggering powers, against the oil industry clinging tenaciously to their unjust tax exemptions. He was up against the military that wanted to engage big time in Vietnam. He was up against them all.
Some of the most fundamental principles of law were disregarded in the investigation; innocent until proved guilty in a trial judged by one’s peers; the right to a defence, to cross examine witnesses, to have access to the prosecution’s files; the non-interference in the appointment of the decision makers; the avoidance of  conflicts of interest; the principle that justice must also appear to be done; the independence and transparency of forensic teams carrying out the autopsy on the slain president.
These are but a few of the cardinal rules that were blatantly broken in the aftermath of the assassination, thereby nullifying any credible outcome of the investigation. Of course the obvious question is, why were all these standard operating procedures ignored in the first place?
No one was ever charged with the assassination. The only arrested man, Lee Harvey Oswald, shouted out to the media in the few seconds he had a chance to, that he was a fall guy, and was in turn killed within two days of the assassination. No defence in his name was ever made, no witnesses heard in open court, no forensic testimony cross examined, no footage officially released to the public.
Instead, in a Hamlet-like tragedy, we had the successor to the murdered head of State appoint a commission to investigate the murder of his predecessor.
Why should an ad hoc commission have ever been appointed by him in the first place, to usurp the power of the official judicial organs? Why was Oswald’s family never permitted to appoint an attorney to defend his name and reputation, and examine the evidence? Why was the memorandum of its own investigator, Attorney Wesley Liebeler ignored by the commission?
Liebeler had pointed out to his Warren Commission that FBI marksmen had failed to replicate Oswald’s alleged rapid fire, and that FBI expert Frazier had testified before the commission that shots fired by FBI agents with the assassination weapon were “a few inches high and to the right of the target… because of a defect in the scope” of the rifle allegedly used by Oswald.
Liebeler tells the commission that “to the extent that it leaves testimony suggesting that the shots might not have been so easy, out of the discussion, thereby giving only a part of the story, is simply dishonest”.
Evidence cited in Jeremy Bojczuk’s book A Brief Guide to the JFK Assassination, furthermore quotes a marine’s report that by the time he left the Marines, Oswald “was a rather poor shot”.
Even without the recent release of secret files, there was so much evidence of something gone horribly wrong
The President’s autopsy was not carried out by an independent, forensic entity, but by the military. Why? Evidence listed in The Kennedy Autopsy, by Jacob Hornberger indicates that the President’s head wounds were tampered with before the autopsy took place.
It was only years later that the world finally saw the unedited footage that has come to be known as the Zapruder film, which clearly shows Kennedy being shot fatally from the front, not the back from the school book depository. The outrage it caused eventually gave rise to a reopening of the investigation by Congress. This important point has been forgotten.
In 1979, a congressional inquiry carried out by the House Select Committee on Assassinations found serious flaws in the Warren Commission Report, concluding that the murder was indeed most likely the result of a conspiracy ‒ Congress’s words, not conspiracy theorists’. Yet somehow today it is still the Warren Commission Report, discredited as it was by Congress that is quoted in the assassination saga. Why?
Add to that the fact that the brother of Chicago Mafia kingpin Sam Giancana confirmed in a biography that his own brother was involved in the assassination. Add to that Jack Ruby, who killed Oswald, was known in the underworld to be a Giancana henchman, running one of his casinos.
The newly released files include a top-secret deposition by  CIA director Richard Helms, who was asked in 1976: “Is there any information involved with the assassination of President Kennedy which in any way shows that Lee Harvey Oswald was in some way a CIA agent…” The deposition cuts off.
The newly released document was tampered with and does not show his reply. Investigators had argued that Oswald had received pay cheques from the CIA, hence the question put before Helms. It was not conspiracy theorists, but a federal judge and the chief counsel of the House Select Committee on Assassinations, who openly accused the CIA of deceit and deception.
Suspicions were later reinforced by a recorded death-bed confession to his son in 2007 of a CIA officer, Howard Hunt, one of the masterminds of the Watergate break in, that there were men in the agency, oil men and persons from the underworld who were involved in the assassination.
Add to that the fact that the President’s own body guards in the secret service were ordered by their superior officer to stand down and walk away from the President’s limousine where they were posted to stand on the bumper as human shields and watch the crowds. Why? We have clear footage of this.
Add to that the declaration of President Lyndon Johnson’s own mistress, Madeleine Brown, who stated on camera for posterity that the night before the assassination, several high-ranking officials within the government, and Dallas tycoons, met at his house (Johnson was from Texas) and after the meeting Johnson told her that “those SOBs will never embarrass me again”.
Roger Stone’s Book The Man who killed Kennedy, makes a case that it was President Johnson, whom Attorney General Robert Kennedy was going to indict for complicity to murder of an agricultural officer whistle-blower, who actually masterminded the assassination. We all know what happened to Bobby Kennedy in 1968.
How is it, one may ask, that even without the recent release of secret files, there was so much evidence of something gone horribly wrong, of much more than a silenced lone gunman who killed the head of State? Why has it remained shrouded in secrecy all these years?
Why do we denigrate investigators as some wacko conspiracy nuts, when the House Committee on Assassinations itself concluded that there was most probably a conspiracy to kill the President?
Could it be that such a conspiracy to murder may well have amounted to a coup d’etat, an overthrow of a government by violent, surreptitious and criminal means, followed by a gargantuan cover up, to maintain the status quo and an extremely powerful elite, setting the US on a very different path than that intended by its democratically elected leader in 1963?
Dr Ragonesi is a lawyer and researcher in international affairs.


Read previous posts.

The Golden Dawn
World Politics / Re: Donald Trump for President
« Last post by IMPERIUM on November 21, 2017, 06:21:18 PM »

Trump Giving the Boot to 60,000 Haitian Apes! GTFO!

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
November 21, 201

...Washington Post:

    The Trump administration has given nearly 60,000 Haitians with provisional legal residency in this country 18 months to leave, announcing Monday that it will not renew the Temporary Protected Status that has allowed them to remain here for more than seven years....

...“Since the 2010 earthquake, the number of displaced people in Haiti has decreased by 97 percent,” acting homeland security secretary Elaine Duke said in a statement. “Significant steps have been taken to improve the stability and quality of life for Haitian citizens, and Haiti is able to safely receive traditional levels of returned citizens.”...


Trump getting rid of primitive Haitians.
In Malta, our short sighted politics are turning this Sacred Island into the Haiti of the Mediterranean.
A People who do not deserve to survive will disappear Racially.

The Golden Dawn

The Lounge / Re: Post your Jokes here!
« Last post by IMPERIUM on November 21, 2017, 04:23:29 PM »

UN chief: Libya slave auctions may be crimes against humanity

...After obtaining footage of a human auction in Libya, a CNN team traveled in October to that country to investigate. It saw a dozen men sold at an auction outside of the capital, Tripoli -- some for as little as $400. The crew was told of auctions taking place at nine locations in the country....


price $650

I know, comparisons are odious.


The Golden Dawn
World Issues / Re: l ngos and immigrants
« Last post by IMPERIUM on November 21, 2017, 11:11:19 AM »

The NGO racket.
A multi million racket disguised as BuonGesuismo - Jesus the Poisoner.
A promise to all these NGO Traitors:  YOU WILL ALL HANG.

The Golden Dawn

World Politics / Re: About Ron Paul
« Last post by IMPERIUM on November 21, 2017, 09:09:22 AM »
Why Are We Helping Saudi Arabia Destroy Yemen?

It’s remarkable that whenever you read an article about Yemen in the mainstream media, the central role of Saudi Arabia and the United States in the tragedy is glossed over or completely ignored. A recent Washington Post article purporting to tell us “how things got so bad” explains to us that, “it's a complicated story” involving “warring regional superpowers, terrorism, oil, and an impending climate catastrophe.”

No, Washington Post, it’s simpler than that. The tragedy in Yemen is the result of foreign military intervention in the internal affairs of that country. It started with the “Arab Spring” which had all the fingerprints of State Department meddling, and it escalated with 2015’s unprovoked Saudi attack on the country to re-install Riyadh’s preferred leader. Thousands of innocent civilians have been killed and millions more are at risk as starvation and cholera rage.

We are told that US foreign policy should reflect American values. So how can Washington support Saudi Arabia – a tyrannical state with one of the worst human rights record on earth – as it commits by what any measure is a genocide against the Yemeni people? The UN undersecretary-general for humanitarian affairs warned just last week that Yemen faces "the largest famine the world has seen for many decades with millions of victims." The Red Cross has just estimated that a million people are vulnerable in the cholera epidemic that rages through Yemen.

And why is there a cholera epidemic? Because the Saudi government – with US support – has blocked every port of entry to prevent critical medicine from reaching suffering Yemenis. This is not a war. It is cruel murder.

The United States is backing Saudi aggression against Yemen by cooperating in every way with the Saudi military. Targeting, intelligence, weapons sales, and more. The US is a partner in Saudi Arabia’s Yemen crimes.

Does holding hands with Saudi Arabia as it slaughters Yemeni children really reflect American values? Is anyone even paying attention?

The claim that we are fighting al-Qaeda in Yemen and thus our involvement is covered under the post-9/11 authorization for the use of force is without merit. In fact it has been reported numerous times in the mainstream media that US intervention on behalf of the Saudis in Yemen is actually a boost to al-Qaeda in the country. Al-Qaeda is at war with the Houthis who had taken control of much of the country because the Houthis practice a form of Shi’a Islam they claim is tied to Iran. We are fighting on the same side as al-Qaeda in Yemen.

Adding insult to injury, the US Congress can’t be bothered to even question how we got so involved in a war that has nothing to do with us. A few conscientious Members of Congress got together recently to introduce a special motion under the 1973 War Powers Act that would have required a vote on our continued military involvement in the Yemen genocide. The leadership of both parties joined together to destroy this attempt to at least get a vote on US aggression against Yemen. As it turns out, the only Members to vote against this shamefully gutted resolution were the original Members who introduced it. This is bipartisanship at its worst.

US involvement in Saudi Arabia’s crimes against Yemen is a national disgrace. That the mainstream media fails to accurately cover this genocide is shameful. Let us join our voices now to demand that our US Representatives end US involvement in Yemen immediately!

Imperivm / Re: Manifesto Of National Futurism
« Last post by IMPERIUM on November 20, 2017, 09:15:38 PM »

by Constantin von Hoffmeister

A specter is haunting the white world - the specter of racial nationalism. All the powers of the tired West have entered into a holy alliance to exorcise this specter: the churches and governments, Merkel and Trump, German antifa and American civic nationalists.

Where is the party in opposition that has not been decried as racist by its opponents in power? Where is the opposition that has not hurled back the branding reproach of racism, against the more progressive opposition parties?

This is why we have the twin phenomena of the establishment calling the AfD a racist party and the AfD, always on the defensive, calling the NPD a racist party. But the AfD‘s tactic of distancing itself from the more progressive, i.e. racist, parties is not paying off. In the eyes of the liberal ruling elite, any party to the right of the CDU will always be racist, no matter what such a branded party might proclaim in terms of denial and bowing to the anti-racist zeitgeist. According to the ever vigilant liberals: Once a racist, always a racist!

That is why it is absolutely futile to deny that one is racist or to insist that one merely fights for successful integration of people from other races or the defense of “Western culture.” The establishment equates all non-compliance with its program of total destruction of the white race and the elevation of multiculturalism to a moral absolute to heresy and thus racism. And once a heretic, always a heretic! And burn the heretic must!

White wing politics: Is it good for whites? This is the only question that pro-white politicians and activists of white countries should ask themselves when trying to formulate policies and legislation. The nation as an abstract concept belongs in the dustbin of history. The Race has become the all-defining factor.

The white race as a whole must survive and thrive. It thus becomes clear that treacherous, reactionary and self-destructive branches, like modern Germans, must be cut off in order for the tree to blossom and reach its full height. A people that does not want to live deserves to suffer and die. The parts of the white race not in active suicide mode, these days mostly central and Eastern Europeans with a few scattered Western Europeans and white Euro-Colonials, need to band together to defend and preserve what is left of the white European heritage for the generations to come. How to go about this truly gargantuan task?

Literally the only issue that is of any importance in white countries today is immigration, regardless of whether it is legal or illegal. All other issues are either secondary in nature or a direct consequence of immigration (for example: high crime rates and high unemployment figures). It is thus imperative that everybody concerned about the long-term survival and advancement of white people put aside their differences in matters not related to the issue of immigration.

Whether a white country will become more socialist or more capitalist in the future is quite irrelevant if whites become a minority in that country. The only purpose of a white country’s existence is to shelter and protect white people. If the government of a white country fails in this task by opening up the country’s borders to hordes of non-whites, it has become illegitimate and must be viewed as the enemy. Arguments about economic systems are pointless if the existence of a clear white majority is not guaranteed.

This is why the white-wing position states: Everything for the Race. For the rest: Nothing. All matters not directly related to immigration and the protection of the white majority are to be put aside until the time has come when whites with white interests are once more in control of their own countries and thus destiny. Before anything else, whites must first and foremost throw off the shackles of domination by alien interests.

Whites of all countries, unite!

Moscow, Russia - November 17, 2017



The Golden Dawn
The Lounge / Re: Norman Lowell speaks from Berchtesgaden and the Zugspitze
« Last post by IMPERIUM on November 19, 2017, 07:27:39 PM »
Norman Lowell speaks from Berchtesgaden and the Zugspitze

Spread the Word

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
SMF 2.0.12 | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
TinyPortal © 2005-2012

VivaMalta - The Free Speech Forum, Recent Posts - Theme by Mustang Forums