VivaMalta - The Free Speech Forum - Polygamy

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
December 15, 2017, 03:35:38 AM

Home Help Search Login Register
+  VivaMalta - The Free Speech Forum
|-+  Humanities and Science
| |-+  Theology
| | |-+  Polygamy
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 [13] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Polygamy  (Read 15655 times)
FORZAMALTA
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 445

« Reply #120 on: March 14, 2009, 05:55:46 PM »

Quote from: IMPERIUM

The Apex, or Absolute Priority, is the raising of our number of White Births.
Polygamy is a partial answer to this grave problem.
We have to disrobe ourselves of X'tian Cretinism.

No White Woman, especially with brains and good genes, should be bereft of children.
I know of a number of excellent Maltese women who chose a career, to child-bearing.
This is a Sin against the Race.

Therefore, we must up breed and increase our numbers - as all the others do.
We must seal our borders, expel ALL non-Europids and introduce methods to increase our numbers.
Imperium 2012

Imperium
0901


an idea i got a few days ago, over a few pints of course, was to plan a TV campaign for more children with the following theme...

film a number of friends in a bar enjoying themselves (so u target youths who only live to enjoy weekends and the material life) and as the year clock goes on in the bottom part of the screen, the group of people is being reduced and reduced. suddenly the group realise that their group has been reduced to a mere 3 people from the earlier large group of around 20 people. they are of course dissapointed. the adverts ends with this similiar message "these are the next generation 'friends'...if our generation doesnt have babies!"
Report to moderator   Logged
Every People gets the Government it Deserves!
marco polo
Senior Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 11571

« Reply #121 on: March 14, 2009, 10:51:22 PM »

good idea, barring lack of funds for such a campaign. if we could film it we could do a youtube release.
Report to moderator   Logged

We must built ships that will not traverse the Seven Seas but the Milky Way and the stars beyond, ships with no sails but engines powered by fuel, sweat and the creative cunning of the race that gave the world everything and will give the universe more than even God ever dreamt of. - Ogeno
IMPERIUM
Norman Lowell
Global Moderator
Senior Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15356


« Reply #122 on: February 20, 2012, 11:27:47 AM »

This Thread needs to be re-read.
It holds a partial answer to the decline of the White Race.
Polygamy will be encouraged in the Imperium - as well as Single Mothers.


No White woman with beauty and brains should be childless.
That is a sin against Nature and one's Race.
Polygamy, as well as Single Motherhood are to be encouraged.


Christian Cretinism (one man, one soul - one man, one woman -  one man, one vote) is now surpassed.
Nature demands proliferation of each species - and let the strong survive - and the weak die.
That is the Cosmic Law - and no morbid Christianity, nothing can change it.


Christianity actually urges Europids to adopt Africans, Ethiopians and what not.
The madness of this anti-Nature disease of the mind.
Christianity has almost killed the White Race.


The Muslims are taking over the world, because of their polygamy.
They are taking over India - they were a tiny minority once and now, are set to dominate it.
Every Muslim woman breeds within a polygamous marriage - an excuse to increase their warriors.


2012: Anno Zero!
Imperium
201202






« Last Edit: February 20, 2012, 11:51:12 AM by IMPERIUM » Report to moderator   Logged
Boycott The Times and The Sunday Times.
Do not post there, do not buy a copy of either, do not advertise.
Hurt Them in the only way they understand.

BOYCOTT THE TIMES
 Imperium 1107

Will
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 154

« Reply #123 on: February 20, 2012, 05:52:33 PM »

It all gets a bit tricky though.What if women want to marry several husbands? i cant imagine many men wanting to stir other mens porridge like that,I certainly wouldnt.I think its in our nature to have a single mate fore life contrary to what jewish pyscobabalists say.It has always been the building block of white civilisation.Thats why we are born with the powerfull feelings of love and jelousy.Once you have a mate/partner you would kill another man who goes near her, those natrual feelings must be for a reason.To protect and secure that union.If the view on polygomy is for the sake of increasing white babies,maybe a better way would be to have breeding farms,nothing seedy just places dedicated to childbirth like the Germans had.Im not against polygamy as such its upto the man and women i suppose,Id just find it too wierd if you all lived in the same house. One women is mad enough, four of them together??
Report to moderator   Logged
IMPERIUM
Norman Lowell
Global Moderator
Senior Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15356


« Reply #124 on: February 21, 2012, 12:11:39 PM »

Re Post 142


http://youtu.be/nUDIoN-_Hxs


Why should any one of these women be childless?
Why should our Race of Biological Aristocrats disappear, after so many millions of years on the planet?
Why?


2012: Anno Zero!
Imperium
201202
Report to moderator   Logged
Boycott The Times and The Sunday Times.
Do not post there, do not buy a copy of either, do not advertise.
Hurt Them in the only way they understand.

BOYCOTT THE TIMES
 Imperium 1107

ComradeDTAII
VM Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 541

SS Acolyte

« Reply #125 on: February 21, 2012, 05:41:45 PM »

Polygamy will be encouraged in the Imperium - as well as Single Mothers.
I find this problematic, Norman. I think the Dominions should have an arranged marriage system in place for single mothers, or even NS styled Hitlerjugend or Soviet Komsomol programs that would extricate children from single (and thus irresponsible) mothers. Male children who grow up without fathers is a sin against nature.

At their coming of age military service would be applicable to male children and the army would become their father. Academy bound males would be sifted from the rank and file.
« Last Edit: February 21, 2012, 06:03:37 PM by ComradeDTAII » Report to moderator   Logged
Love is forever
But just for a few
IMPERIUM
Norman Lowell
Global Moderator
Senior Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15356


« Reply #126 on: February 26, 2014, 06:13:19 PM »

http://www.theabsolute.net/misogyny/onwomen.html

Schopenhauer on Women and Polygamy.

00202
The Golden Dawn
Imperium
Report to moderator   Logged
Boycott The Times and The Sunday Times.
Do not post there, do not buy a copy of either, do not advertise.
Hurt Them in the only way they understand.

BOYCOTT THE TIMES
 Imperium 1107

Wisdom of Jainism
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 169


Chote Baba Re

« Reply #127 on: June 16, 2014, 02:40:59 PM »


Christian Cretinism (one man, one soul - one man, one woman -  one man, one vote) is now surpassed.


One man, one wife.

One man, one vote.

One man, one car.

One man, one house.

One man, one hobby.

Madddonnaaaa !


Christian Cretinism is based on jealousy and envy.
Obsessed by the idea of making everyone equal without realizing that such a goal is never reached.
Then of course, the masons of the inner circle of the clergy can have as many toy-boys as they desire.

Men of superior genetics have the task (not simply a right) of passing on their genes to as many babies as possible.
Men of inferior genetics should be discouraged of having babies at all.
Women must be channeled to the superior men according to their looks and brains.

The Muslims are doing it ... and it is working for them.
The Rodents did it ... and it worked too.
So what is WHITE MAN waiting for ? WAKE UP !   
Report to moderator   Logged
IMPERIUM
Norman Lowell
Global Moderator
Senior Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15356


« Reply #128 on: August 22, 2017, 04:48:14 PM »

If Polygamy is Illegal for Mormons, It Should Be Illegal For Muslims
 
The conviction of two B.C. men for polygamy is attracting the attention of Canadian Muslims who practice polygamy. The two B.C. men (Winston Blackmore and James Oler) are members of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, a break-away sect of the Mormon Church.

Oler has 5 wives and 32 children. Blackmore has 24 wives and 148 children. According to Vancouver Sun columnist Daphne Braham, there are 10,000 fundamentalist Mormons in North America.

By the late 1880s, the American government had outlawed polygamy and Mormons began fleeing to Canada but Canada banned polygamy in 1893.
Blackmore has applied to challenge the constitutionality of Canada’s polygamy law. Dates for the three-day hearing will be set in late August, 2017.The ruling given to Blackmore will affect Canada’s polygamous Muslims.

Canada has over 1 million Muslims. The number of polygamous Muslims in Canada is unknown. Muslims tend to have many children. The potential Muslim drain on Canadian finances is huge. A significant number of Muslims are sympathetic to the aims of the Muslim Brotherhood who have declared that their purpose in settling in North America is to destroy the societies here. One Toronto Imam, Aly Hindy, has stated that he has performed about 30 polygamous marriages. He has also defiantly said that if has to choose between obeying Canadian law or Muslim law which permits up to 4 wives, he will obey Muslim law.

Canada’s “Diversity” PM Trudeau (a sycophant of Muslims) and all Canadians should take note of that statement and pay particular attention to sociological research which overwhelmingly shows that polygamy, ​​​​​in virtually every respect, is detrimental to society, to men, to women, and to children.
Below, we present a list of conclusions about polygamy by Professor Christopher Kaczor of Loyola Marymount University on “The Perils Of Polygamy”.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

LIST OF CONCLUSIONS ABOUT POLYGAMY FROM “THE PERILS OF POLYGAMY”

(1) in a polygamous society, some men take multiple wives, but this leaves other men with greatly diminished prospects of marriage or an exclusion from mating altogether.

(2) In their 2012 article, “The Puzzle of Monogamous Marriage” appearing in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Joseph Henrich, Robert Boyd, and Peter J. Richerson used converging lines of evidence from the social sciences to compare polygamous and monogamous societies. They found that polygamous societies differ from monogamous societies in terms of violent crimes, female educational attainment, domestic violence, parental investment in children, and economic productivity.

(3) A wealth of sociological information points to the fact that single men commit the vast majority of violent crimes. Women and married men seldom murder, rob, rape, and assault in comparison to single men. So, since there are many more single men in polygamous societies, polygamous societies have higher rates of violent crime.

(4) As Henrich and colleagues note: With little reason to invest in the established social order, single males are more likely to turn away from activities conducive to long-term productivity and turn toward the quick thrill, if not a violent overthrow of the established social order. These tendencies are detrimental to society as a whole, including to single men who are the most common victims of theft, violent assault, and murder.

(5) For a female teen, marriage to a much older man makes it unlikely that she will have an equal partnership with her husband and makes the completion of her education difficult, if not impossible. Indeed, marriage at a young age to a much older man is also linked to lethal domestic violence.

(6) The phenomenon of “co-wives” also undermines the well-being of women. The senior wives worry that they will be replaced by younger wives, and the younger wives in turn worry about the power exerted in the home by senior wives. Research indicates that levels of domestic strife and violence are higher in polygamous homes than in monogamous homes as wives seek to preserve their place with their shared husband as well as struggle to secure resources for their own biological children

(7) Co-wife conflict is ubiquitous in polygamous households. From anthropology, a review of ethnographic data from 69 non-sororal polygamous societies from around the globe reveals no case where co-wife relations could be described as harmonious, and no hint that women’s access to the means of production had any mitigating impact on conflict.




(8) These conflicts lead polygamous family units, particularly those with three or more wives, to have in general higher rates of divorce than monogamous couples.

(9) Because the polygamous wives tend to be younger and less well educated, their children suffer in not having more mature mothers, as would be more typical of their counterparts in a monogamous society. The children suffer also from having multiple stepmothers involved in ongoing struggles with each other. Half-siblings must compete for limited resources while having weaker genetic bonds to mitigate the conflict. While these extended-family relationships could in theory be a source of support, more often they endanger children.

(10) Living in the same household with genetically unrelated adults is the single biggest risk factor for abuse, neglect and homicide of children. Stepmothers are 2.4 times more likely to kill their stepchildren than birth mothers, and children living with an unrelated parent are between 15 and 77 times more likely to die “accidentally.”

(11) Polygamous families are also more likely than monogamous families to be in poverty, since typically only one breadwinner supports numerous children.

(12) Polygamous societies also dilute the investment of fathers in their children in at least two ways. First, because marriage to other young women is still an option, a husband’s resources of time, attention, and money are diverted away from his own children and toward finding new mates. Secondly, in virtue of the greater number of children in the polygamous family, it becomes increasingly difficult to give each child sufficient time and attention.

(13) Economic well-being contributes in turn to the stability of families which is a benefit to men, women, and children alike.

(14) In a polygamous marriage, a husband gives himself qua husband to however many wives he has. Wives, by contrast, are expected to reserve themselves in a sexual way for their husband alone. Moreover, wives face inequality among themselves as “senior wives” enjoy rank above “junior wives.” The polygamous relationship can never attain the mutual and complete self-donation of spouses in monogamous marriage because it is intrinsically impossible to reserve oneself in a sexual way entirely for one person and at the same time reserve oneself in a sexual way entirely for a different person (or persons). Marriage understood as a comprehensive union can exist only between two persons, and never more than two persons. Society, therefore, has good reason not simply to proscribe polygamy, but to endorse monogamy.
 
-----------



00508
The Golden Dawn
Imperium
Report to moderator   Logged
Boycott The Times and The Sunday Times.
Do not post there, do not buy a copy of either, do not advertise.
Hurt Them in the only way they understand.

BOYCOTT THE TIMES
 Imperium 1107

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 [13] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
 
SMF 2.0.12 | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
TinyPortal © 2005-2012

VivaMalta - The Free Speech Forum, Polygamy - Theme by Mustang Forums